Evaluasi Infrastruktur Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Lingkungan Perkotaan (Studi Kasus: Kawasan WR Supratman, Bandung)

Authors

  • Gildan Kantona Hamdani Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2024.022.02.7

Keywords:

evaluation, pedestrian infrastructure, urban neighborhood

Abstract

The uneven distribution of planning and provision of adequate pedestrian infrastructure stems from its focus on specific roads in certain areas. This research was conducted around Jalan W. R. Supratman, Bandung City, an urban environment where people live, with various facilities. We evaluate the pedestrian infrastructure using the criteria and aspects of PEQI, combining them with the applicable regulatory standards in Indonesia. PEQI serves as a quantitative observation tool that evaluates the quality and safety of the physical environment for pedestrians, taking into account the needs of the environment, segments, and intersections. The results of the evaluation show that the condition of pedestrian infrastructure in the area is inadequate. Improvements are needed to increase pedestrian interest in this area. The results of the evaluation can provide a basis for stakeholders to take planning steps to provide adequate pedestrian infrastructure in the city of Bandung.

References

Ariffin, R. N. R., & Zahari, R. K. (2013). Perceptions of the Urban Walking Environments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.062

Azmi, D. I., & Karim, H. A. (2012a). A Comparative Study of Walking Behaviour to Community Facilities in Low-Cost and Medium Cost Housing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.129

Azmi, D. I., & Karim, H. A. (2012b). Implications of Walkability Towards Promoting Sustainable Urban Neighbourhood. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.028

Bakhtiar, I. S., Mokhtar, S., & Hussein, M. Z. S. (2022). Pedestrian Infrastructure Quality of Service In Urban Neighborhood: A Case Study in Wangsa Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Civil and Sustainable Urban Engineering, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.53623/csue.v2i1.57

Eboli, L., Forciniti, C., Mazzulla, G., & Bellizzi, M. G. (2023). Establishing Performance Criteria for Evaluating Pedestrian Environments. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043523

Fadila, D., & Angestiwi, T. (2023). Analisis Kualitas Aset Fasilitas Koridor Jalan sebagai Ruang Publik. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, 21(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2023.021.02.11

Herdiana, I. (2023). Hak Para Pejalan Kaki Kota Bandung yang Terabai. https://bandungbergerak.id/article/detail/14988/hak-para-pejalan-kaki-kota-bandung-yang-terabai

Iffiyah, K., Santoso, E. B., & Setiawan, R. P. (2022). The Quality of Pedestrian Based on Pedestrian Environment Quality Index (PEQI) Standards in the Cultural Heritage Area of Tunjungan Street Surabaya. BERKALA SAINSTEK, 10(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.19184/bst.v10i2.28408

Institute for Transportation Development Policy (ITDP) Indonesia. (2017). Panduan Desain Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki DKI Jakarta 2017–2022. Jakarta.

Kusuma, Y., Aryanti, T., & Megayanti, T. (2023). Mewujudkan Livable City: Persepsi Tentang Ruang Terbuka yang Aman dan Tidak Aman di Kota Bandung. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, 21(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2023.021.01.4

Maryati, S., & Firman, T. (2022). Equal Access to Water in Cirebon Regency Urban Area. In Routledge Handbook of Urban Indonesia (pp. 367–379). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003318170-31

Mesfin, T. R., & Denbi, T. J. (2022). Assessment of pedestrian infrastructures of road transport: A case study of Jimma Town. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 7(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.14254/jsdtl.2022.7-2.3

Mulyadi, A. M., & Santosa, W. (2021). Pemenuhan Standar Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Kawasan Central Business District Jakarta (Vol. 21, Issue 3).

San Francisco Department of Public Health. (2008). The Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index (PEQI): An assessment of the physical condition of streets and intersections. www.sfdph.org/phes

Shamsuddin, S., Hassan, N. R. A., & Bilyamin, S. F. I. (2012). Walkable Environment in Increasing the Liveability of a City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.025

Sondakh, A. F. P. (2017). Metode Penilaian Walkability Permukiman di Perkotaan: Sebuah Kajian Literatur Sistematis. Review of Urbanism and Architectural Studies, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2017.015.01.1

Staricco, L. (2022). 15-, 10- or 5-minute city? A focus on accessibility to services in Turin, Italy. Journal of Urban Mobility, 2, 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100030

Tanan, N., Wibowo, S. S., & Tinumbia, N. (2017). Pengukuran Walkability Index pada Ruas Jalan di Kawasan Perkotaan (Walkability Index Measurement on Road Links in Urban Area).

Wahyudi, A., Asteriani, F., Muliana, R., Raihan Aulia, A., & Fikri, M. (2023). An Urban Form Study on Walking Choice (A Case Study in The Central Business District Jenderal Sudirman, Pekanbaru) (Vol. 20, Issue 1).

Wicaksono, A., Hadi Prabowo, A., & Purnomo, E. I. (2019). Analisis Kualitas Jalur Pedestrian di Kawasan Kota Lama Bandung Berdasarkan PEQI (Analysis of Pedestrian Pathways Quality in Kota Lama Bandung Based on PEQI). Jurnal AGORA, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/1025105/agora.v17i1.7406

Downloads

Published

2024-12-02

How to Cite

Hamdani, G. K. (2024). Evaluasi Infrastruktur Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Lingkungan Perkotaan (Studi Kasus: Kawasan WR Supratman, Bandung). RUAS, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2024.022.02.7

Issue

Section

Articles