Transformasi Teritori berdasarkan Kegiatan Pengunjung di Lapangan Gasibu

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2023.021.01.3

Keywords:

activities, personal space, proxemics, privatizing space, territory

Abstract

Personal space (proxemics) in public spaces should be considered essential to keeping the personal area separate from others. Meanwhile, privatization in public space will divide the area into small personal spaces due to the unclear form of territory in personal spaces. This study will identify and reveal the pattern of visitors’ territory transformation based on visitors’ activities in Lapangan Gasibu, Bandung. The data will be collected through observation and a survey on a weekday (Thursday) and weekend (Saturday). Then, the data will be analyzed using a descriptive analysis method based on mapping activities in the area. The result shows three transformations of spaces based on visitors’ activities and territories in Lapangan Gasibu. The pattern of transformation shows some areas of territorial spaces with unclear protection but need to avoid personal conflicts and some shared areas with low protection of territories. Thus, the thoughtful design of public spaces and physical facilities should be taken into consideration. This result is expected to be taken as a design reference for designing and creating comfortable public spaces that meet the need for personal spaces and activities.

References

Acarón, T. (2016). Shape-in(g) Space: Body, Boundaries, and Violence. Space and Culture, 19(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331215623208

Bandung, S. (2015). Lapangan Gasibu , Namanya Merupakan Nama Klub Sepak Bola. Serba Bandung. https://www.serbabandung.com/lapangan-gasibu/

Britton, M. (2008). “My Regular Spot” Race and Territory in Urban Public Space. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(4), 442–468.

Brower, S. N. (1980). Territory in Urban Settings. In Environment and Culture (pp. 179–207). Springer.

Bywater, M. (2007). Performing Spaces: Street Music and Public Territory. Twentieth-Century Music, 3(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478572207000345

Childress, H. (2015). Teenagers, Territory and The Appropriation of Space. Childhood, 11(2), 195–205.

Dea, R. A., Riska, A. S., & Kusuma, H. E. (2021). Pengelompokan Kegiatan di Ruang Publik berdasarkan Waktu, Intensitas, dan Usia. Jurnal RUAS, 19(2), 60–73.

Grosser, M. (1955). The painter’s eye. Rinehart.

Habraken, N. J. (1998). The Structure of The Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment. MIT press.

Hall, E. T. (1964). A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior. American Anthropologist, 65, 1003–1025.

Hantono, D., & Pramitasari, D. (2018). Aspek Perilaku Manusia Sebagai Makhluk Individu Dan Sosial Pada Ruang Terbuka Publik. Nature: National Academic Journal Of Architecture, 5(2), 85. Https://Doi.Org/10.24252/Nature.V5i2a1

Hatuka, T., & Toch, E. (2014). The emergence of portable private-personal territory: Smartphones, social conduct and public spaces. Urban Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014524608

Kärrholm, M. (2005). Territorial Complexity in Public Places-a Study of Territorial Production at Three Squares in Lund. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 18(1), 99–114.

Ostermann, F. O., Zürich, Timpf, S., & Augsburg. (2009). Use and appropriation of space in urban public parks GIS methods in social geography. Geographica Helvetica, 64(1), 30–36.

Ratnasari, A., & Permatasari, R. (2019). Diskrepansi Pemanfaatan Ruang Publik Berdasarkan Teritori Ruang (Studi Kasus: Alun-alun Kota Klaten). Undagi: Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Arsitektur Universitas Warmadewa, 7(1), 1–10.

Rutledge, A. J. (1985). A visual approach to park design (First Edit). John Wiley & SOns.

Sjamsu, A. S., & Dahrma, I. K. A. (2019). Tipologi Teritori Pada Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Di Taman Kota Kendari (Studi Kasus: Taman Walikota Kendari). Jurnal Malige Arsitektur, 1(1), 64–72.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-05

How to Cite

Bachtiar, J. C. U. (2023). Transformasi Teritori berdasarkan Kegiatan Pengunjung di Lapangan Gasibu. RUAS, 21(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ruas.2023.021.01.3

Issue

Section

Articles